Sunday, February 10, 2013

Blog 7 proposal number 2 analysis


Analysis of Proposal Number 2
            The objective of this assignment was to make an effective proposal that persuaded the audience the author was addressing to support the proposal.  In this proposal, it was trying to convince the audience that the SRC, needed to charge less for fitness classes and needed to find ways to allow students to take a variety of classes without being charged for every single class.  The proposal tried to show that if the SRC could either charge less or make package deals it would allow a greater amount of students to participate in the SRC classes and therefore bring in more revenue. 
            However, after analyzing this proposal I agree with the argument, but found it to be an extremely weak argument.  The author made points about how more successful businesses made package deals to make it so a great amount of people would be able to buy their items.  Although, the author did not point out what businesses or what kind of package deals they could give out so it left the reader wanting more.  To make this argument stronger the author could have found sources of other businesses and shown actual businesses and how by using package deals ultimately helped the company make more money. First, the author of the proposal was a student attending ASU.  This helped with her ethos, but then she did not give any more information about herself to make her seem more credible, or have a higher character value.  If the author of the essay could have explained her situation and how she wanted to take classes at the SRC, but they were too expensive or how she could afford the classes, but she had friends who couldn’t.  That would have allowed the audience to gain a better understanding of where she was coming from and would have helped make them want to continue to read what she had to say. 
            Also, in the assignment sheet the author was given it states that the proposal needed to be organized and have a good introduction and a good conclusion.  In this proposal it was repetitive about how the SRC charged $30 - $60 depending on whether or not a student bought session a or b or both sessions.  In place of some of the times this information was expressed in the essay, there could have been a quote from an ASU student who regulary attends fitness classes and one that does not attend.  Then there could have been information regarding how they felt about the price and their opnions.  This would have strengthened the argument and would have shown the audience that many students at Arizona State University agreed with the proposal given by Bonnie Nelson. 
            This audience that the author wrote to were the people that found no problem in the price of the fitness classes at the SRC.  Some of their interests were about how the SRC could maximize their revenue coming in therefore charging $30 per session.  If the author could have given more examples and statistics of how charging less and arranging a package to work with college students and the amount of funds and time they have that would have helped strengthen the argument along with relating to the audience’s logos and pathos. 
            Overall, I do not think that this is a good argument for the proposal assignment.  There was not enough in depth analysis of the problem along with not enough compelling evidence to convince the reader to agree with the proposal.  The only reason that I agreed with the proposal is because I felt that the prices should be lowered before reading the proposal.  Although, if the author could go back and add in student testimonials, statistics about businesses doing well with package deals, and names of businesses and how they implemented a similar thing in their business as the proposal that would make it a strong argument.  Therefore making it a good model for this proposal assignment. 

No comments:

Post a Comment